You are here

Novel hypothesis on why animals diversified on Earth



Can tumors teach us about animal evolution on Earth? Researchers believe so and now present a novel hypothesis of why animal diversity increased dramatically on Earth about half a billion years ago.

A biological innovation may have been key.

A transdisciplinary and international team, from Lund University in Sweden and University of Southern Denmark, presents their findings in Nature and Ecology.

The new hypothesis holds that the dramatic diversification of animals resulted from a revolution within the animals’ own biology, rather than in the surrounding chemistry on Earth’s surface.

Life on Earth was dominated by microbes for roughly 4 billion years when multicellular life – then in the form of animals in robust ecosystems – suddenly made a vigorous entry. Why animals diversified so late and so dramatically has remained unresolved and is a matter of hot debate.

The diversification of animals occurred over a geologically short period of time and is known as the Cambrian explosion. Many geologists have assumed that the Cambrian explosion was triggered by an increase of atmospheric oxygen. However, a causal relationship between the Cambrian explosion and increasing atmospheric oxygen lacks convincing evidence.

Indeed, research over the last years weakens the support for a correlation between the Cambrian explosion and increasing atmospheric oxygen. For example, dramatic changes in atmospheric oxygen are noted both before and after the Cambrian, but not specifically when animal diversification took off.

Simple animals are furthermore noted to require surprisingly low oxygen levels, which would have been met well before the Cambrian.

“A heated hunt for the geochemical evidence that oxygen increased when animals diversified goes on, but after decades of discussion it seems worthwhile to consider the development of multicellularity also from other angles,” said Emma Hammarlund, Ph.D., geobiologist at the division for translational cancer research at Lund University and guest researcher at the Nordic Center for Earth Evolution at the University of Southern Denmark.

In order to understand more about the conditions for multicellular life, Dr. Hammarlund contacted tumor biologist Sven Påhlman, Ph.D., in the Department of Laboratory Medicine at Lund University, who has explored the importance of low oxygen concentrations (hypoxia) in the tumor setting for nearly two decades.

“I wanted to learn what tumor scientists observe on a daily basis in terms of tissue growth and how it relates to oxygen. Tumors are, after all and unfortunately, successful versions of multicellularity,” Dr. Hammarlund explained.

The team, including tumor biologist Kristoffer von Stedingk in Lund University’s pediatrics division, tackled the question of why animals developed so late and dramatically with novel clues from the field of tumor biology. Specifically, they tested whether the same molecular tools exploited by many tumors – to maintain stem cell properties – could also be relevant to the success of animals in the Cambrian explosion.

Cells with stem cell properties are vital for all multicellular life in order to regenerate tissue. For example, cells in the wall of a human small intestine are replaced every two to four days through the division of stem cells.

“Hypoxia is generally seen as a threat, but we forget that oxygen shortage in precise periods and settings also is a prerequisite for multicellular life. Our stem cells are the ones that form new tissue, and they are extremely sensitive to oxygen. The stem cells, therefore, have various systems for dealing with the effects of both oxygen and oxygen shortage, which is clear in the case of tumors,” explained Dr. Påhlman.

These systems involve a protein that can “fool” cells to act as if the setting was hypoxic and also to get stem cell-like properties.

By studying the ability of tumor cells to imitate the properties of stem cells, Dr. Påhlman’s team observed how tumor cells can highjack specific mechanisms that evade the negative effects that high oxygen has on stem cells. As a consequence, the tumor cells are able to maintain stem cell properties despite being surrounded by the high oxygen concentrations that are present in the body.

“The ability to construct stem cell properties despite high oxygen levels, so called ‘pseudohypoxia,’ is present also in our normal vertebrate tissue. Therefore, we flip the perspective on the oxic setting: While low oxygen is generally unproblematic for animal cells, the oxic settings pose a fundamental challenge for complex multicellularity. Without additional tools, the oxic setting makes tissue-specific stem cells mature too early,” said Dr. Påhlman.

The new hypothesis that gives credit to a biological innovation having triggered animal diversification is similar to how we think of biological innovations changing life in the past. Just as the presence of free oxygen is the result of some microbes finding a way of using sunlight to get energy, this was also a biological event — a view that fits with other geobiological observations, such as that environments with “enough” oxygen have been present on Earth since long before the Cambrian explosion.

The hypothesis also has implications for how animals may have varying capacities to live in oxygenated environments, and perhaps even for how we see cancer as an evolutionary consequence of our ability to live in oxygenated niches.

Bringing geobiology and cancer research together

Taking an evolutionary approach is unusual for cancer researchers, even though the development of tumors is generally seen as an evolutionary process.

Similarly, geobiological researchers rarely apply the cellular perspective. But having combined their expertise, Drs. Hammarlund and Påhlman both are surprised that we have not previously wondered about our paradoxical ability to renew tissue in the oxic setting, they said.

“Surely, there are many people who would intuitively disagree. But once you flip the perspective on the oxic niche and start to consider it as challenging for stem cell properties and tissue renewal, then puzzling observations from distant fields starts to fit together. And you can’t turn back,” Dr. Påhlman concluded.

Learn more: